Talk:Memory Speed Tests: Difference between revisions
⧼vector-jumptonavigation⧽
⧼vector-jumptosearch⧽
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy. | Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy. | ||
{|class="compattable sortable" width="100%" cellspacing="1" | |||
!width="37%" |Title | |||
!width="7%"|Type | |||
!width="7%"|Manufactured in | |||
!width="7%"|Size (MB) | |||
!width="7%"|Read (MB/s) | |||
!width="7%"|Write (MB/s) | |||
!width="7%"|Random Access (ms) | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
like so. | |||
Revision as of 13:06, 17 July 2007
Many duplicate entries for the 1GB Japanese Kingstons...
- Yeah, there needs to be a standardized format and template. Dirtie 23:49, 11 March 2007 (CET)
Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy.
| Title | Type | Manufactured in | Size (MB) | Read (MB/s) | Write (MB/s) | Random Access (ms) |
|---|
like so.