Difference between revisions of "Talk:Memory Speed Tests"
From WikiTemp, the GBAtemp wiki
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy. | Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy. | ||
+ | {|class="compattable sortable" width="100%" cellspacing="1" | ||
+ | !width="37%" |Title | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Type | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Manufactured in | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Size (MB) | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Read (MB/s) | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Write (MB/s) | ||
+ | !width="7%"|Random Access (ms) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | like so. |
Revision as of 13:06, 17 July 2007
Many duplicate entries for the 1GB Japanese Kingstons...
- Yeah, there needs to be a standardized format and template. Dirtie 23:49, 11 March 2007 (CET)
Errm. How about... a table? I've seen those in scientific magazines and they look quite snazzy.
Title | Type | Manufactured in | Size (MB) | Read (MB/s) | Write (MB/s) | Random Access (ms) |
---|
like so.