Difference between revisions of "Talk:WiiScrubber Game Sizes List"
From WikiTemp, the GBAtemp wiki
m (Must be removed?) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:^^^ Totally agree, plus could you possibly add in a confirmation part instead of having it next to the XXXX MB, so if confimed we can write yes: Wiikey or summin - [[Special:Contributions/86.138.251.116|86.138.251.116]] | :^^^ Totally agree, plus could you possibly add in a confirmation part instead of having it next to the XXXX MB, so if confimed we can write yes: Wiikey or summin - [[Special:Contributions/86.138.251.116|86.138.251.116]] | ||
| − | :will a section for rar size be useful in the scrubbed game size list ? --[[User:Noisound|Noisound]] 00:44, 26 February 2008 (CET) | + | :will a section for rar size be useful in the scrubbed game size list ? -- [[User:Noisound|Noisound]] 00:44, 26 February 2008 (CET) |
== Scrubber Value data == | == Scrubber Value data == | ||
I noticed the Scrubber Value for Puzzle Quest: Challenge Of The Warlords to be 4347MB which seems outrageous given both the NTSC-U and PAL releases were ~285MB each. Will the scrubbed iso compress down to around this size too? Scrubber Value may be a deceiving estimation. | I noticed the Scrubber Value for Puzzle Quest: Challenge Of The Warlords to be 4347MB which seems outrageous given both the NTSC-U and PAL releases were ~285MB each. Will the scrubbed iso compress down to around this size too? Scrubber Value may be a deceiving estimation. | ||
| − | :you answered your own question when you found scrubbed releases which a lot are compressed. scrubber value is not deceiving estimation, its going through needed testing and gets many games right and only a few wrong. --[[User:Noisound|Noisound]] 06:11, 26 February 2008 (CET) | + | :you answered your own question when you found scrubbed releases which a lot are compressed. scrubber value is not deceiving estimation, its going through needed testing and gets many games right and only a few wrong. -- [[User:Noisound|Noisound]] 06:11, 26 February 2008 (CET) |
| − | + | == Some errors == | |
| − | + | Puzzle quest was ripped before wiiscrubber. I'm not entirely sure how it's done but if you try compressing it as is without scrubbing, you'll see it'll shrink right now. Also, anyone notice the code for the sort by size isn't proper. It follows the first character instead of treating it as a number. -- [[Special:Contributions/69.202.69.20|69.202.69.20]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Also, anyone notice the code for the sort by size isn't proper. It follows the first character instead of treating it as a number. | + | |
== Page Removing == | == Page Removing == | ||
| − | Is this page still useful, or shall I remove it? | + | Is this page still useful, or shall I remove it? - [[User:Tj cool|tj_cool]] 21:40, 26 April 2010 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 19:40, 26 April 2010
Wouldn't the list be better if it is sorted in release # just like the Wii Free Region list? --SleepyPrince 16:26, 25 February 2008 (CET)
- ^^^ Totally agree, plus could you possibly add in a confirmation part instead of having it next to the XXXX MB, so if confimed we can write yes: Wiikey or summin - 86.138.251.116
- will a section for rar size be useful in the scrubbed game size list ? -- Noisound 00:44, 26 February 2008 (CET)
Scrubber Value data
I noticed the Scrubber Value for Puzzle Quest: Challenge Of The Warlords to be 4347MB which seems outrageous given both the NTSC-U and PAL releases were ~285MB each. Will the scrubbed iso compress down to around this size too? Scrubber Value may be a deceiving estimation.
- you answered your own question when you found scrubbed releases which a lot are compressed. scrubber value is not deceiving estimation, its going through needed testing and gets many games right and only a few wrong. -- Noisound 06:11, 26 February 2008 (CET)
Some errors
Puzzle quest was ripped before wiiscrubber. I'm not entirely sure how it's done but if you try compressing it as is without scrubbing, you'll see it'll shrink right now. Also, anyone notice the code for the sort by size isn't proper. It follows the first character instead of treating it as a number. -- 69.202.69.20
Page Removing
Is this page still useful, or shall I remove it? - tj_cool 21:40, 26 April 2010 (CEST)
