Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wii Drivechip Comparison"
(Speed fix?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
- For DVD+R support, chips that support with AND without booktype should be Green, chips that work with booktype only (-ROM) should be Blue (as not all burners can support writing booktype).<br /> | - For DVD+R support, chips that support with AND without booktype should be Green, chips that work with booktype only (-ROM) should be Blue (as not all burners can support writing booktype).<br /> | ||
- If a feature doesn't really work even though it is listed as being supported by the manufacturer, the feature should be listed as Red.<br /> | - If a feature doesn't really work even though it is listed as being supported by the manufacturer, the feature should be listed as Red.<br /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Speed fix? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Explain? I thought the 3.0 upgrade of the Cyclowiz fixed the drive speed issue. If this is what is being referred to, it doesn't really belong, since all it was was a glitch on their behalf. | ||
Revision as of 08:56, 5 April 2007
Quick thoughts on article cleanup (kai445@school):
- For GameCube region free, I think chips that support it natively without swap should be Green, chips that support via swap should be Blue, regardless of it working with every single game.
- For DVD+R support, chips that support with AND without booktype should be Green, chips that work with booktype only (-ROM) should be Blue (as not all burners can support writing booktype).
- If a feature doesn't really work even though it is listed as being supported by the manufacturer, the feature should be listed as Red.
Speed fix?
Explain? I thought the 3.0 upgrade of the Cyclowiz fixed the drive speed issue. If this is what is being referred to, it doesn't really belong, since all it was was a glitch on their behalf.
