Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wii Drivechip Comparison"
(→Speed fix?) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Explain? I thought the 3.0 upgrade of the Cyclowiz fixed the drive speed issue. If this is what is being referred to, it doesn't really belong, since all it was was a glitch on their behalf.--[[User:Dirtie|Dirtie]] 10:56, 5 April 2007 (CEST) | Explain? I thought the 3.0 upgrade of the Cyclowiz fixed the drive speed issue. If this is what is being referred to, it doesn't really belong, since all it was was a glitch on their behalf.--[[User:Dirtie|Dirtie]] 10:56, 5 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Wiikey Audio Fix? == | ||
| + | So does the Wiikey has "audiofix" or not? some sources say so, some not. | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 19 April 2007
Quick thoughts on article cleanup (kai445@school):
- For GameCube region free, I think chips that support it natively without swap should be Green, chips that support via swap should be Blue, regardless of it working with every single game.
- For DVD+R support, chips that support with AND without booktype should be Green, chips that work with booktype only (-ROM) should be Blue (as not all burners can support writing booktype).
- If a feature doesn't really work even though it is listed as being supported by the manufacturer, the feature should be listed as Red.
Speed fix?
Explain? I thought the 3.0 upgrade of the Cyclowiz fixed the drive speed issue. If this is what is being referred to, it doesn't really belong, since all it was was a glitch on their behalf.--Dirtie 10:56, 5 April 2007 (CEST)
Wiikey Audio Fix?
So does the Wiikey has "audiofix" or not? some sources say so, some not.
